We believe that most communities in 21st century Britain have the skills, resources, and wherewithal to meet their own needs if their various stakeholders are connected in the right ways.
We think that, where these connections do not work properly now, it is at least partly due to a financial system which emphasises the efficient use of capital – maximising financial returns – over the creation of new economic and social value.
Company management, particularly those working for firms that have external shareholders, is incentivised to focus on delivering profits and maximising return on capital. In this context, capital is usually defined in a very narrow way – financial assets, manufactured capital, and inventory. Or, more colloquially, money, machines and materials. There is no place in conventional accounting for recognising the overall value-creating capability of a company’s workforce or of citizens in society. As a result, human capital is often viewed in accounting terms as a cost to be minimised rather than as an asset, the value of which can be enhanced by appropriate investment in skills, knowledge, and experience.
This means that many individuals get left behind in a system which is constantly seeking to drive down cost, while innovations that could significantly improve social outcomes or generate new growth struggle to get off the ground due to lack of funding. There is a direct cost to society both in monetary terms through the higher cost of benefit claims and loss of tax revenues, and socially as those who find themselves at the bottom end of the labour market or excluded from it altogether can become stuck, sometimes over multiple generations, with disastrous consequences for their personal well-being and their ability to contribute to society. It results in an economy which is operating at less than its full potential and increasing social need.
And yet, studies that have attempted to account for the value of human capital, including by the Office of National Statistics, show that it amounts to around 70% of the total asset base of the UK economy. If the key decisions about how to allocate scarce resources are being made based on less than 1/3rd of the economy (actually it is even less than that because no account is taken of the value of natural assets either) then it perhaps should not come as a surprise that many of those decisions turn out to be less than optimal for society in general.
Only by treating individuals as the human beings that they are, with capabilities to be achieved and potential to be reached when provided with appropriate investment and support, will we be able to aspire to an economy that optimises return on all forms of capital – financial, fixed, natural, human, and social.
It is this more rounded approach which Seebohm Hill seeks to achieve.